Data Recovery Case File · Pricing & Second Opinions · The Number, Not the Diagnosis
When the first lab got everything right except the price: a second opinion that changed one thing only
Second opinions in this trade usually re-litigate the diagnosis; this one didn't need to. The customer's 4TB Seagate external had gone away to a recovery company and come back with a finalised engineer's report — pasted into his enquiry in full: drive clicks and spins down when powered; opened within a clean lab for internal examination; failing read/write heads preventing access; partition tables unreadable as a consequence; heads defined, work itemised. Professional, coherent, and consistent with everything this archive documents about clicking drives. His problem was one line further down: "they have quoted me a very high price and I just wanted a second opinion." Fair. Here's how that works when the medicine isn't in question — only the bill.
| Device | Seagate 4TB external hard drive — clicking and spinning down; previously examined by another laboratory |
| First lab's findings (supplied) | Clean-room internal examination performed; read/write heads failed; data and partition structures unreadable in consequence; head replacement required |
| The dispute | Price alone — the diagnosis accepted, and on free re-assessment, confirmed |
| Equipment used | laminar flow bench · donor head-stack · ACE Lab PC-3000 Express + Data Extractor |
Grading the report — and pricing the same job honestly
Their report earned the professional respect it showed: the symptoms match the diagnosis, a clean-lab opening is the correct venue for internal examination, and "partition tables unreadable due to read/write failure" is exactly the right causal framing — paperwork unreadable because the reader failed, not independently corrupted. A drive professionally opened and reassembled elsewhere is also, contrary to a common fear, a perfectly transferable patient: labs take over each other's cases routinely, the drive travels between them like any other parcel, and the only requests worth making of the first firm are the standard courteous ones — the drive returned assembled, any findings in writing (his already were). What a fair figure for the confirmed job should contain is worth publishing, since it's the whole reason he wrote: one fixed price covering the donor head assembly, the clean-air surgery, the full imaging, verification, and return media — with no-recovery-no-fee underneath it. Beware, in any quote, of the price that unbundles those (donor "sourced at cost" on top, return drive extra, imaging billed by the hour), of urgency tiers that make the standard service feel punitive, and of figures that arrive before assessment — precision before examination is salesmanship, not engineering. His re-assessment here was free, confirmed their diagnosis wholesale, and produced the like-for-like fixed figure his enquiry was really asking for.
The recovery
With the commercial question settled by comparison — he proceeded — the technical half ran the road both labs had independently mapped: donor head-stack fitted under laminar airflow, the drive's firmware secured on the PC-3000, and Data Extractor imaging the 4TB head by head, the partition structures their report had correctly declared unreadable resolving cleanly the moment a working mechanism could serve them. Coverage closed in the high ninety-nines; his files were verified and delivered on new media, inside the quoted figure, with a completion report to sit beside the first lab's diagnostic one — the two documents together telling the whole story of a job diagnosed in one place and priced in another.
Outcome
Full recovery at the number that brought him here — and a consumer method stated cleanly, because it's legitimate and this trade should say so. Shopping a diagnosis on price is allowed. Get the first lab's findings in writing (a firm that diagnoses well deserves the credit his report gets on this page); expect the second lab's re-assessment free and its verdict specific — confirming or contesting, never vaguely undercutting; compare whole-job fixed figures with return media and no-fix-no-fee inside both; and keep the drive powered down while you decide, since the one commodity comparison genuinely spends is time. The diagnosis was never the question here. The answer to the actual question was: yes, you're allowed to ask.
Holding a quote that made you flinch
Separate the two things a quote contains: the diagnosis (judge it on coherence — does the report explain symptoms, method and findings, as this one did?) and the price (judge it on comparison — like-for-like, all-inclusive, fixed). A high price on a sound diagnosis is a shopping problem, not a trust crisis; a precise price on no examination is the reverse. And a professionally opened drive transfers fine — ask for it back assembled, findings in writing, and take both to the second bench.
Send the report over — call Bristol Data Recovery on 0117 332 1137 for a free confirmation and a like-for-like figure.
Request a quote online →
Our case files are drawn from genuine enquiries received by our laboratory over the past ten years, anonymised to protect client confidentiality. Each one describes the diagnostic and recovery procedure our engineers apply to that fault, using the equipment listed.